Social Injustice in To Kill a Mockingbird - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 895 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2019/02/20 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: To Kill a Mockingbird Essay Did you like this example? Racism was a very large part of society in the south during the 1930’s. Many colored people were thought of as less than their peers. Whites were considered better than African Americans were, and almost every white person accepted the unjust judgment. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Social Injustice in To Kill a Mockingbird" essay for you Create order Racial discrimination hit hard in the south. Many of the characters in To Kill a Mockingbird were impacted by racial discrimination but the one that was impacted the most was Tom Robinson. In To Kill A Mockingbird, Harper Lee uses Tom Robinson to highlight racist attitudes in the 1920 ´s Alabama when Tom was accused and killed by people that thought he was guilty only because he was black. The blacks had no voice and were often oppressed by a white male. Even though slavery was abolished in 1865 the white people kept their racist views of being superior to the black community. In the eyes of the whites, black people would never be seen as equal. Although the times of slavery have been over for 70 years, during the times of the book is in the 1930’s, Lee portrays there to still be tension between whites and blacks. However Lee also shows the progression of racism during the trial case of Tom Robinson. In the past, a black man on trial accused of anything would always be seen as guilty in the eyes of a white jury, regardless of the circumstances. The jury would be characterized as wearing blinders for they would not look at the evidence and would use someone’s colour of skin to determine a verdict. In Robinson’s case it was the exact same. Yet it took the jury a very long time to come to the final verdict of having Tom be seen as guilty. In Atticusâ €™s mind, this was seen as a victory. Since the jury debated on whether or not Robinson was guilty, it shows them trying to see past the blinders and trying to make a more informed decision. But through the loss of the case, Lee shows how society still has a long way to go before racism can be abolished. Hopefully, in the generations to come these steps towards a racist free society can be made. Harper Lee shows this hope through the young character of Scout Fisher. One of the protagonists, Scout Fisher is a symbolic representation of the hope in the future she represents. Although Scout is only a young girl at the age of 7 years old, she is able to understand that racism is a terrible cycle that needs to end. Through her intelligent and humble father, Scout learns the harsh reality of how the color of someone’s skin can define their future and abilities. â€Å"I think there is only one kind of folks. Folks.†. Through this statement it shows Scout believes that the color of someone s skin should not define them. Scout is a young Alamban women who is surrounded by a racist community. This also parallels the author, Harper Lee. Lee grew up as a tomboy with older brothers. She was born in 1926, Scout was also born around this time. The story is told in first person by Scout, in whom Harper Lee lives through as she has had similar experiences with the racism in the southern states being that she is a young, white girl with the same vie wpoint. Lee’s background allows her to relate on a more personal level to the characters, especially Scout. This allows a reader to feel a deeper connection with the characters. As they are able to be written more in detail due to Harper Lee’s extensive knowledge and personal connections on the themes of the novel. The author also uses symbolism, circular plot, and irony to take the novel to the next level. It allows the reader to read between the lines and add depth to the novel. The symbolism and irony in the book is evident through the title. The title’s significance is the innocence of a mockingbird. Normally, a mockingbird is an innocent animal who does nothing wrong. A mockingbird is known for it’s sweet melody and innocence. Due to this, when someone is to kill a mockingbird, they are killing someone who is innocent. The jury parallels someone who is killing something that is innocent. The jury forces Tom into prosecution and ultimately death. This also parallels what happens at the beginning of the story when another death almost occurs. A mockingbird at the beginning of the story is almost shot by Jem. Tom Robinson is symbolic of this mockingbird, as Tom is also shot at the end of the novel. These two events create one of the circular plots in the novel. During the first event , Atticus explains how it â€Å"is a sin to kill a mockingbird† this indirectly implies that what the white jury did by prosecuting an innocent man and putt ing im in harm s way, is a sin. Scout adds that it , â€Å"was the only time [she] ever heard Atticus say it was a sin to do something.† . This quote shows the significance in Atticus’s mind that hurting something that has done nothing wrong is a misdeed and an immoral act. Just these two events allow for many different connections to be made and through them, the reader is able to learn the life lessons Lee explicitly gives.

Why Capital Punishment Should Not Remain As A Punishment...

Debate on Death Row The other day the Capital Hill Gang hosted a debate discussing the reasons why Capital Punishment should or should not remain as a punishment for prisoners. The following will present the main ideas expressed for and against Capital Punishment although slightly summarized. Lastly I will be closing with a few questions presented by the audience followed by their final statements and my personal remarks. One of the first issues that are always brought up concerning the death penalty is its morality. Those for the death penalty, they addressed the fact that the opposition would suggest that the death penalty is inherently immoral because no one or one government should take someone’s life. In the cases sentences to the†¦show more content†¦The Bible teaches forgiveness and love and by killing criminals we rob them of the chance to accept and find God’s love and forgiveness. Throughout history scientist have worked on improving methods of execution to be more humane nevertheless despite chargers of cruel and unusual punishment the Court has continuously rejected challenge. Statistics so far has shown that the death penalty has deterred murder, if it is one thing people fear more than anything is death. Statistics show that in towns where capital punishment is enforced there is a decrease in crime rates such as rape and murder. They offer that the justification for capital punishment is that the deserved punishment of those that commit heinous crimes provides just retribution, not revenge, which is supported by a different motive. The families of the victims argue that it is unfair that while their loved one had to die unjustly that their killer goes on to live out the rest of their days; even if it is in a jail cell. But what does one do about the irrevocable mistakes of people who were mistried and midsentence to death. As with all forms of justice noth ing is 100% correct all of the time, the judges, jurors and lawyers are all humans and they make mistakes. However the opposition views the death penalty as severe and unusual punishment due to the amount of pain suffered and the way people are executed. There have been cases where

Talk Show Free Essays

TALKSHOW SCRIPT Dr. X:Hello and welcome to Your Life Sucks, Get Over It. Today’s topic will be violent relationships and why the heck people stay in them. We will write a custom essay sample on Talk Show or any similar topic only for you Order Now We have 5 very special people on the show today. Now, first we have to get to know you. Please state your name and blood type. Tom: What does blood type have to do with ANYTHING? Dr X: Just answer the question. Tom: Uh†¦Tom†¦and I don’t know my blood type†¦ Dr X: Right then. And you, please state your name and blood type Elsa: Elsa, and why do YOU have to know my blood type? Dr. X: Because it’s MY show. YOU’RE just on it because your life sucks! Elsa: No. That’s Caitlin. NOT ME!! Dr. X: O†¦k†¦and you, name and blood type. Saint: My name’s Saint†¦and I love football. Dr. X: Wait, REAL name and BLOOD TYPE!! Saint: Patrick, and I love FOOTBALL!! Dr X: Ok, we know you like football. Now state your blood type. Saint: FFFOOOOOOTTTTTTTBBBBBBAAAAAAAAALLLLLL!!!!!!! Dr X: You know what, forget it. And you, name and blood type. Mario: Mario Ortega, blood type AB negative. Dr X: Ok, good. And you? AJ: (Starts to cry)†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! Mario: That’s AJ. He’s a little EMOtional. AJ: AHHHHHHHHH, what? Dr X: All right then. Let’s get started. So, who actually has BEEN in a violent relationship? All:†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. AJ†¦AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!! Dr X: Anyone? Mario:†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. Me. Dr X: All right, now we got a show going! So tell us, Mario, what role did you play in the violent relationship? Mario: The violent one. Audience: OOOOOOOOOOOO!! Dr X: Hmm. What did you do to her†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. or him? Mario: Uh, her, and I pushed my pregnant wife out a moving car. Audience: BOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! Dr X: Why? AJ: TO MANY QUESTIONS!!!!!! AHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!! Mario: O†¦k†¦My father got on my nerves. Dr X: Oh, I see. You were mad at your FATHER so you pushed your WIFE out a moving car. That makes PERFECT sense!! Moving on! Mario: No, wait, that’s not what I†¦ Dr X: Tom, you’ve been quiet. What’s up with you? AJ: AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!! Tom: SHUT UP!!!!!! AJ: †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ Tom: Thank you. Anyway†¦. AJ: (stabs self with pencil) Tom: (Looking at AJ) Uhhhh†¦ Can I move? Dr X: NO!! As you were saying. Tom: (Still looking at AJ) My best friend Nick was in a violent relationship. Dr X: (rubbing chin) Interesting. So how did this affect you? Tom: Ummm, I felt uncomfortable? Dr X: GOOD!!! AJ: AHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! All (including audience): SHUT UP!!!!!!!! AJ: (whimpers) Dr X: Ok, Eliza†¦. Elsa: It’s ELSA!!! Dr X: How do you fit into all this? Elsa: MY best friend Caitlin was in the violent relationship with HIS best friend Nick. (Points to Tom) Tom: Don’t you point at ME like that!!!! I didn’t have ANYTHING to do with it!!! Elsa: (Still pointing at Tom) I’ll point where it want to!!! AJ: AHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! Saint: I like football! Dr X: THIS IS NOT THE JERRY SPRINGER SHOW! THIS IS MY SHOW AND THERE WILL BE NO FIGHTING ON MY SHOW! DO I MAKE MYSELF CLEAR! (Everyone but AJ is absolutely quiet. AJ is still crying. Someone in the audience coughs. ) Dr X: We’ll be right back after this commercial break. Dr X: Welcome back to Your Life Sucks, Get Over It. (Looks to Tom and Elsa, who are on opposite sides of the stage. ) We were just getting to Saint. Saint: Foot†¦ Dr X: DON’T YOU SAY FOOTBALL!!!!!!! Saint†¦soccer†¦. Dr X: (dirty look to Saint) All right now. How do you fit into this? Saint: I’m Caitlin’s new boyfriend. Dr X: And how did this come about? Saint: After Nick beat Caitlin up, I asked her out. Dr X: So you were taking advantage of that vulnerability she was going through just after she and Nick broke up. Saint: No†¦ Dr X: Now, Mario, do you know anything about this particular violent relationship? What’s your connection to it? Mario: I was Nick’s anger management teacher when Caitlin got a restraining order on Nick. Dr X: So you teach an anger management class when you have your own anger problems? Mario: I got over my anger problems. Dr X: Right. So, since you’re in charge of the anger management class, why do you think that Nick beat up Caitlin? Mario: She did something he didn’t want her to do and felt like he needed to take control of her by showing her that he was in charge. Dr X: I see. Now, AJ, you’ve done nothing but cry and stab yourself with a pencil. Just where do you come into this? AJ: AHHHHHHHHHH!!! Dr X: STOP THAT CRYING!! (AJ stops crying) Now, answer the question. AJ: †¦I was in Nick’s anger management class. Everyone in there was under court orders to take the class. Everyone in there had hit his girlfriend. We all felt like we needed to control something, or someone, so we tried to control our girlfriends. Dr X: Hmm. Eliza†¦ Elsa: IT’S ELSA!! Dr X: What do you think caused Nick to feel the need to control people? Elsa: How am I supposed to know? I don’t know him; I don’t even like him! Dr X: Tom, you were Nick’s best friend, what do you think caused it? Tom: Problems at home. He and his dad didn’t exactly get along. Dr X: What do you think caused that? Tom: Nick’s dad beat him up. Dr X: Elizabeth†¦ Elsa: IT’S ELSA!! Dr X: Were there any signs before Nick beat Caitlin up that Caitlin was in a violent relationship? Elsa: Yes. Dr X: What were they? Elsa: Nick made Caitlin spend all her spare time around him, Nick made her stop hanging out with me, he always had to know where she was, he told her what to do, he even slapped her and left a big red nark on her face. Then Caitlin tried to break up with Nick, but he gave her a ring and she went out with him again, even though I confronted them both about that mark on her face. They both denied that he did that to her, but I know he did it. Dr X: Well, now you know the signs and the reasons. Make sure your life doesn’t suck because of a violent relationship. Until next time! How to cite Talk Show, Papers

Business Models Sustainable Innovation

Question: Discuss about the Business Models for Sustainable Innovation. Answer: Introduction: The term public private partnership describes the processes where the public (Government) and private sector work hand in hand to accomplish the desired result. The public private partnership usually involves the finances of the private sector along with the collection of plan, structure, preservation and occasionally additional services into a long-standing agreement. In Australia, there are mainly two essential public private partnerships (Willoughby 2013). The first is where the main revenue stream or resource of financial support which repays the personal sector finance used to construct the facility takes the structure of a service payment from the government. This model is generally used in educational institutes, hospitals and other social infrastructures. The second public private partnership is where the main resource of financial support takes the form of accusation paid by the consumer of that particular infrastructure (Gangwar and Raghuram 2015). Both the models share some common features. The Public private partnership in Australia has seen many users pays PPPs. Public private partnerships represent less than ten percent of the total government infrastructure procurement in the country. The PPPs are mostly used in Victoria and New South Wales (Gangwar and Raghuram 2015). The small amount is suitable, as improved value for money can be accomplished by using conventional delivery models for most of the transportation project. The primary purpose of the government is to make social development of the country. The government carries out the desire of the people. Whereas the sole aim of the private sector companies is to maximize the profit by exploiting the recourses. However the PPP model of business development aims at developing the sustainable model of conducting business (Gangwar and Raghuram 2015). It helps in eliminating one drawback of private business practices by making them more answerable for their operations. Thus PPP model of business helps in encouraging the environmentally sustainable business practices and also helps in community development. Sustainable business model: The business model mainly focuses on the need and wants of the customer. It tries to fulfill the need of the consumers as soon as possible. Innovation in business models involve a business to modify how it communicates within the market (Willoughby 2013). Sustainability covers the issues related with the environment, corporate social responsibility, long-term stability and endurance of the business (Sharma and Bindal 2014). The sustainable business model is an advancement to offering goods and services, which offer financial remuneration for the business. It helps to develop the world and offers financial remuneration for the business. A sustainable model of business will earn profit over a huge period without causing any ecological damage. The sustainable model of business offers a competitive benefit by sustaining profit and societal objectives (Sharma and Bindal 2014). Relationships: Sustainable businesses will earn more benefit from engaging employees to work with the suppliers, customers and other communities. Sustainable development lays path to development of the current generation while at the same time ensures availability for their growth and development of the future generations. Partnership: There are companies worldwide who work with their consumer and suppliers throughout the supply chain. The focus on working together has helped the business efficiently (Sharma and Bindal 2014). Customer relationship: Customer loyalty has become one of the major engagements of the companies. Companies tend to focus on every individual and try to satisfy the need of the particular individual. Social involvement: Business can work with different social communities to mutual advantage. The resulting concern is best for sales and reputation of the brand. Advantages of Public private partnership: Value for money: The primary motive to use the public private partnership is that, for a particular project PPP can distribute advanced value for money for the administration that some other substitute deliverance model (Bocken et al.2014). It is quite obvious from the early Australian government policies that the primary focus was on triumph over the fiscal constriction and the countries limitations of the loan council on borrowing by the state government. There are countries that continue to observe PPPs as a means of transport the public transportation that the government cannot or else manage to pay for. Superior cost and time outcomes: Public private partnership has a good character for delivering project right on the occasion and within the anticipated budget. The most dependable study of the relative presentation of public private partnerships and conventional procurement in Australia, that was published by the Melbourne University (Bocken et al.2014). A study related to twenty five public private partnerships projects was compared and forty two procured projects all over the Australia since a long time. The PPPs experienced standard construction cost over runs of four percent, compared with eighteen percent for the conventionally procured projects (Bocken et al.2014). The average construction phase delay for the PPPs was less than two percent compared to twenty six percent for the traditionally procured project. Innovation: The long term character of the public private partnerships contract makes the government think more about the achievable outcome of the project. The tender documents of the project tend to be more result oriented. They mainly identify the services that the government wants to deliver, instead of the resources by which those services are distributed. This offer great scope for the personal sector to bid inventive solutions that can distribute the required service at a inferior whole life cost. Advancement and allowance for procedure and preservation cost: PPP agreements pack the provision of preservation and other process phase services into the same agreement as the design and structure services (Laukkanen and Patala 2014). Revenues that are conventional by the SPV in the form of consumer charges or service costs must consequently cover the cost of the preservation and additional services. Enhanced project scoping and risk measurement by the government: The superior authoritative conviction of expense and occasional results on PPPs is likewise a consequence of the extra exertion government association take while planning PPP ventures (Laukkanen and Patala 2014). There are numerous explanations behind this, including the extensive haul nature of the PPP agreements, their high esteem, and the involvement of treasury offices. Examples: Rolling stock public private partnership is one of the biggest PPPs in the history of Australia. Sydneys Waratah is a next generation suburban traveler trains specially designed to offer the customers with enhanced safety, protection and available features (Devkar and Kalidindi 2013). The latest fleet was acquired by the New South Wales Governments $3.6 billion rolling accumulation public private partnership. The contract with the private sector is to construct and retain six twenty six new Warantah carriges for a phase of thirty years. It is the biggest distinct procurement of trains in the history of Australia (Devkar and Kalidindi 2013). It is as well the same of the current Sydneys current suburban fleet. In December 2006, a rolling stock public private partnership was entered into with Reliance Rail (Devkar and Kalidindi 2013). The Reliance Rail group consists of equity associates namely Downer EDI, AMP Capital, Royal Bank of Scotland Group and International Public Partnerships. Reliance Rail is supported by a team of industry experts, which contains engineering and service associations such as Downer EDI Rail and Hitachi. Reliance Rail provides six twenty six carriages, a maintenance facility at Auburn, the company promises to maintain the fleet for thirty years (Devkar and Kalidindi 2013). It also simulates for crew training. Another example of pubic private partnership can be Gold Coast Rapid Transport project of Australia where in 2009 the Queensland Government submitted four hundred and sixty four million dollar to the Gold Coast Rapid Transit venture (Low 2013), supplementing three sixty five million dollar conferred by the Australian Government and One twenty million dollar invest by the Gold Coast City Council (Low 2013). The major deed of the project for an establishment in which the administrator consents to fund, outline, develop, produce, introduce, test and commission the light rail framework for the Gold Coast, work and keep up the framework for a long time and afterward hand the framework back to the State toward the end of the term and help the State with the making arrangements for and usage of any Future Stages (Low 2013). Conclusion: To conclude, the article discusses the that open private associations (PPPs) give a vital apparatus to governments trying to extend and enhance the foundation and conveyance of social administrations for their natives, and can help financial development and destitution lessening. Actualizing effective PPPs at last depends on the capacities of the people entrusted with making them work. The accessibility of particular abilities expected to get ready, dispatch, and oversee PPPs can speak to a noteworthy usage challenge in creating nations. Profiting from PPPs includes a cautious and complex planning process as conclusive results may require some serious energy to appear after the agreement has been agreed upon. The genuine terms of legally binding assertions and the progressions expected to make an empowering situation will rely on upon the nation, the part, and regularly the particular exchange. The strides expected to arrive, however, are dependably the same, constituting an importan t system for nations to succeed with their PPPs. References: Bocken, N.M.P., Short, S.W., Rana, P. and Evans, S., 2014. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of cleaner production, 65, pp.42-56. Boons, F. and Ldeke-Freund, F., 2013. Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, pp.9-19. Devkar, G.A. and Kalidindi, S.N., 2013. Adoption of PPP Model For Delivery Of Urban Services: A Perception Analysis. University of Central Lancashire (UCLAN) Preston, UK 1820 March 2013, p.11. Gangwar, R. and Raghuram, G., 2015. Framework for structuring public private partnerships in railways. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 3(3), pp.295-303. Kaur, N., 2012. Public-private partnership. Journal of Interdisciplinary Dentistry, 2(3), p.228. Laukkanen, M. and Patala, S., 2014. Analysing barriers to sustainable business model innovations: innovation systems approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 18(06), p.1440010. Liu, J., Love, P.E., Smith, J., Regan, M. and Davis, P.R., 2014. Life cycle critical success factors for public-private partnership infrastructure projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(5), p.04014073. Low, N., 2013.Transforming urban transport: the ethics, politics and practices of sustainable mobility. Routledge. Osborne, S.P., Radnor, Z., Vidal, I. and Kinder, T., 2014. A sustainable business model for public service organizations?. Public Management Review, 16(2), pp.165-172. Sharma, M. and Bindal, A., 2014. Public-private partnership. International Journal of Research, 1(7), pp.1270-1274. Willoughby, C., 2013. How much can public private partnership really do for urban transport in developing countries?. Research in Transportation Economics, 40(1), pp.34-55.